Certified Professional Public Buyer (CPPB) Practice Test

For a leaking roof, what reason can the buyer use to request compensation from the roofing manufacturer?

1. Latent defect

2. Patent defect

3. Substantial completion

4. Acceptance of minor nonconformities

The correct answer is: Latent defect

A buyer can request compensation from the roofing manufacturer for a leaking roof under the concept of a latent defect. A latent defect refers to a flaw or issue that is not readily observable or discoverable upon initial inspection of a product or service. In the case of roofing materials, the problem may not be evident until a significant time after installation, which could lead to leaks or structural damage. This situation is particularly relevant when the defect originates from the manufacturing process or the materials used, and it was not identifiable during a reasonable inspection before the roof was installed. Because latent defects can compromise the function and safety of the roofing system, they are grounds for seeking compensation from the manufacturer under warranty or liability provisions. In contrast, patent defects are obvious and detectable upon reasonable inspection, making them less likely to warrant compensation claims unless they were specifically excluded by the manufacturer’s warranties. Substantial completion relates to construction projects where work is deemed complete in a way that allows the owner to occupy or use the structure, not directly linked to compensation claims. Acceptance of minor nonconformities typically refers to slight deviations from specifications that are acceptable in the context of the contract and would not justify a claim for compensation.